requestId:684c3e16e50664.55048458.

2019 Confucianism Research Summary

Author: Liu Zengguang, Ni Chao (Chinese Academy of Philosophy)

Source: Author Authorized by Confucianism Network Published

              Original from “Hangzhou Teachers’ and Fans’ Journal” (Social Science Edition) 2020 Issue 2

Time: Confucius was the 2570th year of the fourth month of the Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Gengzi Jesus April 27, 2020

 

Abstract: Overall, the Confucianism research in 2019 still presents a diversified trend, including a solid analysis of Confucian classics, a sorting out the origin of Confucian thought, and a contemporary creation of Confucian philosophy. This article summarizes five aspects to sort out the Confucian status this year, namely: the interaction between Confucianism and subschools, and the recent Song and Ming dynasties, a knowledge competition program with a doctoral student as the protagonist is very popular. Multi-faceted research on science, expansion and deepening of Confucianism in the late Qing Dynasty and contemporary times, profound exploration of tribute and Confucian political philosophy, and Confucianism in a comparative field.

 

Keywords:Study, Confucianism, theory, compared with

 

Recalling the 2019 Confucian study, overall, it presents a diversified trend. This article covers five aspects to discuss, namely: the interaction between Confucianism and subschool, the multi-faceted study of the Song and Ming dynasties, the expansion and deepening of Confucianism in the late Qing Dynasty and contemporary times, the profound exploration of the tribute and Confucian political philosophy, and the study of Confucianism in a comparative field. Of course, these five topics cannot cover all the Confucianism seminars in 2019, but for the hot topics that are concerned about in the academic world, we can collect and summarize them. We hope that this summary can bring reference and development to colleagues in the academic world.

 

1. The interaction between Confucianism and subschool

 

Study is the foundation of Confucianism, and subschool is the content included in the cooperation between Confucianism and other subschools, and is also the main component of Confucianism. In recent years, with the rejuvenation of Confucianism, the rejuvenation of education and scholastics has become an important manifestation. In 2019, research and discussions in the academic and subschool fields became an important trend. For academic research, it is important to evaluate from three aspects: one is the discussion of classic Confucian works; the second is the discussion of some major figures in the history of academic development; and the third is the discussion of some major topics in the history of academic development.

 

In terms of Confucian classical essays, a large number of works and essays have emerged in 2019. In July 2019, the “School Literature Research and Discussion Collection” (Editorial 21) compiled by Yu Wanli published a book, with the latest research results on academic, literary, historical research and other aspects, including articles on Confucian classics such as “Zuo Ji”, “Baihu Tong”, and “Book of Changes”. [①] In August, “China” written by Peng LinNational Studies (Editorial 24) published a book, with contents and contents in the Qing Dynasty, Shangshu Research, Sanyou Research, and Training of Famous Products. It was developed from the original discussions such as “Shangshu” and “Sanyou”, and detailed interpretation of Confucian traditional texts, and a comprehensive analysis of the results of the Qing Dynasty academic research. [②] In September, the “New Study” (Editor 4) compiled by Dun Bingyuan was published by the Shanghai National Library Society, which contains articles about “Shangshu”, “Confucianism World Law”, and “Sihuitang Poems”. [③] The “Study on Kong Da’s ” written by Mu Youren, takes the “Five Morality” in charge of the revisions of Kong Da in the Tang Dynasty as the subject of the research and conducts a profound and detailed analysis of the meanings and commentary relationships of the “Five Morality” in charge of the revisions. [④] Sun Shaohua’s “Text Order: The Finalization of the International Thinking of Huan Yu and the Two Hans” [⑤] The book selects “Text Order” as the starting point, and reminds the International Way of Huan Yu and the Two Hans of Classical Text. The author believes that text order has a close connection with social order, and text order is a response at a stable level of society. This paper examined the academic landscape between Huan Yu and the two international schools, the disputes between ancient and modern literature, Huan Yu’s history, literature and other ideas. Jiang Haijun’s “History of the Southern Song Dynasty” was analyzed and summarized through literary sorting, considering the practical evidence, and studying analysis, and analyzed the pure source, inheritance, interpretation methods and historical influence of the Southern Song Dynasty’s academic schools, and explored the internal connection between Southern Song Dynasty’s academic studies and politics, and its position in the entire Chinese history and academic thinking history and its historical value. [⑥] Chao Yuepei’s “Spring and Autumn Annals of Qing Dynasty” discusses the scholars who studied “Age” in the Qing Dynasty and their representative works from the perspective of academic research. The characteristic of this book is that studying “Age” in the Qing Dynasty from the perspective of academic research rather than thinking about history is a useless exploration to revise Confucian classics. [⑦] Wen Haiming’s book “Zhou Yi Mingyi: A New Exploration of Zhou Yi Philosophy” proposes a perfect hexagram change system, and provides a novel interpretation of the thinking of “Zhou Yi” from the perspective of meaning. [⑧] The “Academic History Reading Book” co-authored by Jo Xiuyan and Ye Jingfang introduces the discussions of many students such as Ma Rong, Zheng Xuan, He Yan, Liu Xuan, Zhao Kuang, Zhu Xi, Yang Hui, and Sun Lie, presenting a study example in the three main periods of the two Han Dynasties, the Tang and Song Dynasties and the late Qing Dynasty, providing readers with clear understanding of the diversity of classical and academic abilities. [⑨]

 

A large number of results have also emerged in the discussions of major academic figures. Confucianism is formed and developed on the basis of classical principles. In recent years, the Confucian community has aroused a hot research and discussion in the Han Dynasty, and Dong Zhongshu’s research and discussion is also represented. Li Zonggui pointed out that Dong Zhongshu’s Confucianism is a “new Confucianism” that truly realizes the transformation of creative nature and innovative development. The purpose of Dong Zhongshu’s Confucianism’s energy can be combined with the four words “forward, upward, good, and practical”. [⑩] Korean stars believe that Dong Zhongshu is very particular about his five trajectories and is particularly hardworking in”Age” Gongyang learned, and based on this, he established the focus of the “Five Constant Persons” of Renyi and Rong Zhixin in the Han Dynasty, rebuilding domineering politics, criticizing reality, standardization and correction of the monarch. Integrating Mencius and Xunxun within Confucianism, focusing on Confucianism outside Confucianism, integrating Taoism, Law, Yinyang, Mohism, etc., constructing a new Confucian thinking system with no point in Mohism, realizing the integration of Confucianism in the era of Emperor Wu of Han and the economic system of social and political, laying the foundation for the mainstream and leading position of Confucianism and Confucianism after the Han Dynasty. [11] Yu Zhiping pointed out that Dong Zhongshu’s “establishing Taixue” and “setting order” approach were implemented, and Confucianism began to penetrate into various aspects of China’s social career in an organized manner, making Confucianism gradually become a “cursive religion.” Dong Zi asked the county magistrate and county magistrate to become “common teachers”, using officials as teachers and king as sages. This design of officials as a whole is a picture of China’s integration of politics and religion, but it also quietly and usefully integrated Taoism into politics. [12] Ding Sixin developed the problem of “destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”, and rebuked Liang Qichao and Yi Baisha’s specialized theory of Confucianism in Han Dynasty, believing tha